West Ham condemns discriminatory chant against Solomon

West Ham has called on its supporters to ban a chant deemed “offensive and divisive” heard during their opening Championship match against Burnley. The club confirmed it is aware of the chant directed at winger Manor Solomon, which contains an “anti-Palestine message,” and was chanted by some supporters away at Turf Moor during last Sunday’s 2-2 draw.

A player with a marked career path

Manor Solomon, an Israeli international, joined West Ham from Tottenham this summer. The 27-year-old has previously played on loan at Fulham and Leeds. It was with the Peacocks that he won the Championship in the 2024-25 season. With the Israel national team, he has made 49 appearances and won three titles in Ukraine with Shakhtar Donetsk before moving to England.

A reminder of the club’s values in the face of misconduct

In a statement released ahead of their first home Championship game of the season, against Charlton on Saturday, West Ham reminded supporters of “the responsibility we all share to represent the club in the right way.” The club stressed that “every supporter is an ambassador” for the team. The club added: “Regardless of their background, all supporters within our diverse fanbase must be able to attend matches without fear, discrimination or abuse. We remain committed to ensuring everyone feels safe, respected and included.”

Chants and traditions, but without division

West Ham acknowledges that chants are an integral part of the matchday experience. The club encourages supporters to sing with pride for their club and players, but “never in a way that creates division or offends other fans.” The club concluded by emphasizing that these values apply to all, without exception. Solomon, who made his debut in the Hammers’ colours at Burnley, is at the centre of this controversy despite his impressive sporting career. To learn more about the issues surrounding West Ham’s transfers, read our analysis on the potential arrival of Troy Parrott for £25 million. Additionally, the club’s ownership could change with the arrival of new investors, as discussed in a proposed 25% takeover by Staveley.